14.8.07

Ol' Yellow Eyes

13 August 2007 Monday the 13th. The day started with a bang when my boss decided it was time for me to host the daily conference call. I've been listening to the calls for years now, but had never really needed to participate overmuch. Now, I was hosting the thing. I'm sure my nervousness squeaked out in my voice, but i muddled through and managed to get through my day successfully. Outside, the temperature ranged from hot to bloody damn hot. I did not play in my team's final game of the season. The Strikers did win, though, meaning we may or may not be relegated. I think that will boil down to penalty points (that is: points deducted from our total because we didn't do certain things). The day also happens to be Brett's birthday (Happy Birthday, mate!). To celebrate we went to Taco Cabana. Then, Brett, Jill & I wound our way down to No Frills Grill for the final set of natal libations. Through all of this, I didn't take a single photo. Nope. Not one. Luckily my friend, Cormac, stood still long enough in the midnight hour for me to snap this shot: Ol' Yellow Eyes
I tried to Photoshop the yellow out of his eyes, but after a few attempts, I gave up and left it there. They lend a certain mystique.
Cheers.

~KR (13 August 2007)

Listening to:
Airegin by John Coates
on Piano ... Forte!!

Camera: Canon PowerShot S1 IS
Exposure: 0.017 sec (1/60)
Aperture: f/3.5
Focal Length: 58 mm
Exposure Bias: 0/3 EV
Flash: Flash fired, auto mode, red-eye reduction

2003 Arsenal Away Strip

12 August 2007 Sunday. What're Sunday's for? Football, that's what! Sadly, I didn't get to play in the second to last game of our football season. And, I think I'm glad. The pitch-side temperature according to reports was 104 degrees Farenheit. I'd have likely keeled over from that kind of heat. I did get to watch my Gunners play against Fulham though. A lovely 2-1 win at the Emirates to start the season. And that in spite of Lehmann's howler at the 57 second mark. Had Arsenal lost, likely this would be a different photo. But, since they won, I figured a photo of the shirt I was wearing, a 2003 Arsenal away strip, might be appropriate. Of course, I wasn't wearing it during the photo, but none-the-less, we're calling it my lucky strip. At least for now. 2003 Arsenal Away Strip
Cheers.

~KR (12 August 2007)

Listening to:
The Prince Song by Ghetto Pony
on Post Apocalyptic Bubblegum Music

Camera: Canon PowerShot S1 IS
Exposure: 0.25 sec (1/4)
Aperture: f/3.1
Focal Length: 8.5 mm
Exposure Bias: 0/3 EV
Flash: Flash did not fire

2.7.07

Pearls Before Swine

Very possibly one of the funniest single strips of this decade:

22.3.07

Ten Reasons I Hate Travel (part I)

Ok. So, I don't really hate travel; in fact I love travel so much I went to work in the travel industry. However, there are aspects of travel that cause me undue chafe. Over this ten part post, I hope to share with you those things about travel that rankle me most; and if the mood strikes, I might just provide solutions, too. So, on we go. I) Entry points to the "sterile area" This is so very high on my list of displeasure that it simply had to be first on the list. There are so very many things wrong with the methodologies being employed, or perhaps its even the employees themselves that are the problem, that I'm not quite sure where to start, but since I have to start somewhere...let's start with wait time. Travel guidelines suggest arriving at the airport 2 hours prior to your departure for domestic travel and 3 hours prior to departure for International travel. Have you ever wondered why this is? It's for the security check and not for any other reason. In the world after a September 11th tragedy, we are experiencing the fall-out from a reactionary governmental act that has put in place a bungling, ineffective agency to safeguard the portals to the airports. Along with this have come beauracratic decisions that have no real basis in the real world, but have issued forth from deep within the troubled recesses of politcal minds too far removed from real-world norms to understand what they have done. Why else would we have to queue up as cattle at a milking station to undress in public for the benefit of a total strange who is just going to yell "bag check!" at the slightest hint of irregularity in your carefully packed bags? When I travel on a day-trip, I take one backpack that has in it all the bits & bobs I'll need for that day: my laptop and attendant cables, my cellphone, my camera (see my photo journal), work documents, a book, mp3 player and headphones, contact solutions & glasses case and perhaps a snack. In order for me to get through security into the "sterile area" I have to take off my shoes & belt and place them in a bin with my jacket on top; I have to unpack my laptop, camera & cellphone and place them in another bin; I have to pull out my 1 quart (NO larger!!!) zip lock baggie with my contact solutions in it and place that in yet another tub and I still have to deal with my backpack. All of this is supposed to fit on a 4-6 foot long table that may or may not be at the same height as the converyor belt. Assuming the table and the edge of the scanning machine are of a similar height, which is by no means a safe assumption, I slide the bins, one at a time, into the opening while hoping that the person on the other side of the divided table is paying attention to the "laws of merging traffic" and lets me get all my stuff on before she starts in with hers. Finally, after numerous starts and stops, all my bins get placed on the belt, and my backpack, considerably lighter now, gets placed face-down on the conveyor. The whole packages then moves slowly into the recesses of the machine to be scanned for contraband. Meanwhile, the hundreds of people behind me waiting & (hopefully) prepare, to do the exact same dance for the Transportation Safety Authority. I have only now to re-pack my belongings and re-dress myself in public before continuing on to my gate. But as happens so very frequently, "bag check!" is yelled by the minimum wage cross-eyed girl sitting behind the machine. Yep, my backpack needs to be checked; all those cables and connectors for my laptop apparently look suspicious enough to warrant a hand-check and a chemical sniff. At least it affords me the opportunity to re-dress in leisure and because I arrived 2 hours before my flight, as suggested, I'm not overly worried about getting to the flight on time. After the TSA has declared that they really are just cables to a computer, I'm allowed to continue on my way. But now, after nearly an hour in line, I have not the time to get a frosty adult beverage from the bar nearest the gate. I must plod on and bite my frustrations on my tongue with the calming effect of a good stiff drink. How can this be made better? I think a few simple things would help a great deal. First, is there really a need to check my boarding pass 2 or even 3 times during that experience? Check it once, check it througoughly as I walk through the metal-detector. Second, make the table on which we prepare our bins & bags and buckets of stuff longer and for goodness sake, butt it up against the edge of the conveyor belt after making sure it's the same height. Being able to push from one end and slide the whole bit into the machine at once would be a massive burden-easer. Third, when your bag has passed the screening test and doesn't need to be hand-checked or sniffed, shoot the thing out the end for immediate retrieval. Don't make the passenger wait because the sap behind him in line forgot to take that bottle of hotel shampoo out of his toiletries bag. I find it increasingly irritating to wait while someone else's bag needs to be gawked at and pointed at when mine has already passed muster. Just rearrange the conveyors in such a manner that after it's cleared, it's on a separate belt. Fourth: can we please have more room in which to get re-dressed? It's a circus scene. Look around you at all the folk hopping around on one foot trying to put on the other shoe, a belt and repack a bag in a hurry so the lines aren't held up anymore than they already are. Fifth, and this is the easy one. Hire only nice people. Standing in line for 40 minutes be barked at by some drill-sergeant reject is sure to put everyone in a bad mood. Sixth, pay the poor folk doing that horrifically thankless job a little more money. The attrition rate of a TSA agent is high. Too high. Pay them more, and they might stick around a little longer and be a little nicer. I know I'd rather pay a few extra dollars every time I walk into an airport if I know that the security line is going to be handled by and efficient, knowledgeable, polite workstaff and that not every single computer cable or hotel shampoo bottle is going to demand a "bag check!" That's it. Wastrel On! (Listening to: Led Zepplin)

Think you know your European Geography?

Try this on for size...

16.3.07

Premiership Blog from EPL Talk

An excellent, if a bit rambling, discourse on the futility and idiocy of resolving every football match draw with penalties can be found at the Premiership Blog from EPL Talk. Wastrel On! Listening to: Hold Me Down by Tommy Lee

9.3.07

Shakespug

Ahhh hell. This is the funniest thing I've seen in a long time. I've just snorted potato & bacon soup all over my keyboard; and let me tell you that is not a pleasant experience. Wastrel On! Listening to: Lucky Man by The Verve

21.2.07

Musicovery : interactive webRadio

Musicovery : interactive webRadio Frankly, this is one cool site. Granted, you only gain access to LoFi unless you become a subscriber; but at less than $4.00 a month, even that is a good deal. And, of course, if you listen to the LoFi through cheap-ass ear-buds like the ones I have at work, it won't matter one whit. I chose a spot on their screen somewhere between Dark & Energetic, but a little closer to Dark. It popped up a great looking music map that fed me Enemy by Days of the New. Immediately following that was Gay Dad with Dimstar. It's pretty, it's slick, it's functional and it lets me check out music. I love that. Wastrel On!

12.2.07

APOD: 2007 February 5 - Comet Between Fireworks and Lightning

APOD: 2007 February 5 - Comet Between Fireworks and Lightning: "Astronomy Picture of the Day
2007 February 5 Comet Between Fireworks and Lightning Credit & Copyright: Antti Kemppainen Explanation: Sometimes the sky itself is the best show in town. On January 26, people from Perth, Australia gathered on a local beach to watch a sky light up with delights near and far. Nearby, fireworks exploded as part of Australia Day celebrations. On the far right, lightning from a thunderstorm flashed in the distance. Near the image center, though, seen through clouds, was the most unusual sight of all: Comet McNaught. The photogenic comet was so bright that it even remained visible though the din of Earthly flashes. Comet McNaught continues to move out from the Sun and dim, but should remain visible in southern skies with binoculars through the end of this month. The above image is actually a three photograph panorama digitally processed to reduce red reflections from the exploding firework. "

26.1.07

Gifts Welcome

For those of you that read this bit of drivel, you may feel free to purchase me anything from this page. Wastrel On! (Listening to: Man Out of Time by Elvis Costello)

18.1.07

Oldest Backgammon Table Found in Iran

I have lifted the below article from here, because the site was very slow and I didn't want to subject anyone else to it. ================================== Iran Oldest Game, "Backgammon" Jan 11, 2007 Iran's Burnt City Throws up World's Oldest Backgammon Originally published on Dec 4, 2004 The oldest backgammon in the world along with 60 pieces has been unearthed beneath the rubbles of the legendary Burnt City in Sistan-Baluchistan province, southeastern Iran. Iranian archeologists working on the relics of the 5,000-year-old civilization argue this backgammon is much older than the one already discovered in Mesopotamia and their evidence is strong enough to claim the board game was first played in the Burnt City and then transferred to other civilizations. "The backgammon reveals intriguing clues to the lifestyle of those people," said Mansour Sajjadi, head of the research team. "The board is rectangular and made of ebony, which did not grow in Sistan and merchants used to import it from India." He added the board features an engraved serpent coiling around itself for 20 times, thus producing 20 slots for the game, more affectionately known in Persian as Nard. The engraving, artistically done, indicates artisans in the Burnt City were masters of the craft. "The 60 pieces were also unearthed inside a terracotta vessel beside the board. They were made of common stones quarried in the city, including agate and turquoise," Sajjadi added. Experts still wonder why they played the game with 60 pieces and are trying to discern its rules, but it at least shows it is 100-200 years older than the one discovered in Mesopotamia. They are also intrigued that inhabitants of ancient civilizations, widely believed to be concerned with their daily survival, could afford to indulge in such luxuries as playing board games. © Iranian.ws

15.1.07

Postal Experiments

Considering my current position in my job, I found this Improbable Research to be very amusing! Wastrel On! (Listening to Paloma by Carbon Leaf)

8.1.07

A Letter to Movie Tavern

After recent visits to The Movie Tavern -- a local movie theatre with a full bar, kitchen & wait staff -- were negative experiences, I wrote this letter in hopes that they would wake up. I'll post the response (if I get one). ==================================================================================== Greetings, I am writing this email as a concerned consumer and to commit to writing the previously only vocalized issues I have experienced at your establishment. First, you should know that I am a dedicated movie-goer and have been for the greater part of two decades. I visit your location several times a month occasionally visiting several times in a week. You would certainly know my face if not my name. I do not venture to other theatres overly much, as yours is the most convenient; and truthfully the option of having a beer & a pizza with my movie is quite addicting. You are, undoubtedly, aware that you have direct competition opening just a few miles down the highway in the form of the Studio Movie Grill. This competition could very easily draw hard-earned, established clientele from your halls. It is to this end that I am writing this email. I believe in loyalty and in supporting my local shops; I have no desire to stray further away than necessary. However, as of late the thing that drives my loyalty -- customer service -- has been severely lacking from your employees. It's not unusual for me to arrive and find a seat 15 minutes prior to a movie yet still have no opportunity to place my order even a full 15 minutes into the movie. Since the Movie Tavern purports to provide an environment wherein I am waited on I find the delay in wait-service distracting and deplorable. Your need to remove the "coaster lights" from service was unfortunate, but the current method of standing the menu on end does not work as, apparently, the servers cannot see them effectively. Or perhaps it's simply the fact that in the woeful "me-first" generation from which you must pluck your employees there simply are none left that care. Whatever the cause, the situation that has resulted from it is difficult to support. I have not enjoyed my last half-dozen (or more) visits to your theatre because of the lack of care and lack of respect the majority of your employees exhibit (there are exceptions, but sadly I don’t recall their names). This is of great concern to me. I have very much enjoyed having a Movie Tavern in my neighborhood and hope very much that a Movie Tavern will remain in my neighborhood for many years to come. But, obstacles to that longevity are in your way. I entreat you to find a solution to your service/employee issue prior to the Studio Movie Grillopening its doors (in 7 days), else long-term customers such as myself may very well re-locate to an environment that cares more. Sincerely, A Concerned Movie-Lover

3.1.07

I'm Supergirl (and the Joker)?

I was delighted to find a "What Superhero Are You?" test online. I've taken all the others, but I've never figured out just which Marvel or DC superhero best describes me. I'm pretty sure I still haven't. Maybe it's because I have the brain of a girl; but I'm pretty damn sure I'm not lean & muscular nor am I a defender of the innocent. Nuts. I REALLY wanted to be Batman. Your results: You are Supergirl
Supergirl
65%
The Flash
65%
Green Lantern
65%
Superman
60%
Batman
60%
Hulk
60%
Spider-Man
50%
Wonder Woman
50%
Catwoman
50%
Robin
42%
Iron Man
30%
Lean, muscular and feminine. Honest and a defender of the innocent.
Click here to take the Superhero Personality Test UPDATE: I just found the Villain version, too. I guess if I can't be Batman, I may as well be Batman's nemesis *mwahh hahh* Your results:
You are The Joker
The Joker
60%
Magneto
58%
Lex Luthor
58%
Dr. Doom
52%
Poison Ivy
50%
Dark Phoenix
50%
Apocalypse
48%
Green Goblin
48%
Mr. Freeze
47%
Catwoman
44%
Mystique
44%
Riddler
41%
Venom
39%
Kingpin
39%
Two-Face
32%
Juggernaut
28%
The Clown Prince of Crime. You are a brilliant mastermind but are criminally insane. You love to joke around while accomplishing the task at hand.
Click here to take the Supervillain Personality Quiz
Ooohh, that was fun. Wastrel On! (Listening to: Babe, I'm Gonna Leave You by Man)

28.12.06

Boy Brain? Girl Brain?

Take this test to find out. ;-) My results: The result came back on a graph with a 0 in the middle and 100s on each end. To the right was the word Men, while on the left was the word Women. I scored a 25 on the Women side; so I guess I have a woman's brain in this body o'mine. Here are the actual results of the test I took: Part 1 Angles This task tested your ability to identify the angle of a line by matching it with its twin. This is a spatial task, which looks at how you picture space. Your score: 19 out of 20 Average score for men: 15.1 out of 20Average score for women: 13.3 out of 20 If you scored 0 - 12: You have more of a female brain. Scientists believe that people with a female brain find it more difficult to judge the slope of a line because they're not wired for spatial tasks. In past studies, 65 per cent of people who scored in this range were women. If you scored 13 - 17: You found this test neither hard nor easy. This suggests your brain has male and female traits when it comes to spatial ability. If you scored 18 - 20: You have more of a male brain. On average, men outperform women in this task and those with more mathematical knowledge tend to score quite high as well. In past studies, 60 per cent of the people in this range were men. Interestingly, men's testosterone levels fluctuate through the seasons and studies have shown that men's scores are lower in the spring, when their testosterone levels are at their lowest. Spot the difference This task tested your ability to identify which objects changed position. You lost points, if you incorrectly identified objects. Your score: 86% Average score for men: 39% Average score for women: 46% If you scored between 0 - 33%: You may have more of a male brain. Scientists say men tend to under perform in this task. The corpus callosum, the part of the brain that links the right and left hemispheres, is a fifth larger in women. This means women can process visual and other signals at the same time more easily than men. There is also a theory that oestrogen levels in women give them an added advantage in spatial memory. If you scored between 34 - 66%: You may have a balanced female-male brain. If you scored between 67 - 100%: Those with a female-type brain generally score in this range. Your ability to remember where objects are may serve as an advantage to you when you're trying to find your way around places. You're more capable of recalling landmarks to get from one place to another. ================================================================= Part 2 Hands You said your left thumb was on top when you clasped your hands together. Right thumb on top: This suggests the left half of your brain is dominant. Many studies have tried to establish whether there is a relationship between handedness and brain dominance. Some scientists believe that if you are left brain dominant, you would be more verbal and analytical. Left thumb on top: This suggests the right half of your brain is dominant. Some studies theorise that as a right brain dominant person, you may excel in visual, spatial and intuitive processes. However, these theories are debatable and leave much to be said about the small percentage of people who are ambidextrous. ================================================================= Part 3 Emotions and Systems This task looked at whether you prefer to empathise or systemise. Empathising Your empathy score is: 7 out of 20 Average score for men: 7.9 out of 20Average score for women: 10.6 out of 20 Empathisers are better at accurately judging other people's emotions and responding appropriately. If you scored 15 and above, you are very empathic and would be an ideal person to comfort people in a time of crisis. Women in general are better at empathising. Systemising Your systemising score is: 12 out of 20 Average score for men: 12.5 out of 20Average score for women: 8.0 out of 20 Systemisers prefer to investigate how systems work. A system can be a road map, flat pack furniture, or a mathematical equation – anything that follows a set of rules. A score of 15 and above suggests you're good at analysing or building systems. Men in general are better at systemising. Scientists are keen to learn more about people who score high or low on both tests. They want to find out whether or not empathising and systemising are linked. Some scientists claim that our empathy and systemising abilities can be traced all the way back to prehistoric times. Eyes This task tested your ability to judge people's emotions. Your score: 8 out of 10 Average score for men: 6.6 out of 10 Average score for women: 6.6 out of 10 If you scored 0 - 3: Do you think you're good at judging how another person is feeling? Your score suggests this doesn't come to you quite so naturally. If you scored 4 - 6: Your result suggests you have a balanced female-male brain and find it neither easy nor difficult to judge people's emotions. If you scored 7 - 10: Your result suggests you are a good empathiser, sensitive to other people's emotions. Women generally fall into this category. Professor Baron-Cohen at the University of Cambridge says that people usually perform better than they expect to on this test. Men often think a person's eyes are sending signals of desire when that's not the case at all. ================================================================= Part 4 Fingers We asked you to measure your ring and index fingers. Your ratios came to: Right Hand: 1.02 Left Hand: 0.97 Average ratio for men: 0.982 Average ratio for women: 0.991 It's thought that your ratio is governed by the amount of testosterone you were exposed to in your mother's womb. The ratio of the length of your index finger to the length of your ring finger is set for life by as early as three months after conception. Even during puberty, when we experience intensive hormonal changes, the ratio stays the same. Men generally have a ring finger that is longer than their index finger, which gives them a lower ratio than women, whose ring and index fingers are usually of equal length. Studies have found that men and women with lots of brothers generally have more masculine finger ratios. ================================================================= Part 5 Faces This task looked at how you rate the attractiveness of a series of faces. The images you looked at were digitally altered to create slight differences in masculinity. Your choices suggest you prefer more feminine faces. Highly masculinised male faces possess more extreme testosterone markers such as a long, broad and lower jaw, as well as more pronounced brow ridges and cheekbones. Interestingly, women's preferences are said to vary across the menstrual phase. A more masculine face is preferred during the 9 days prior to ovulation, when conception is most likely. A typical 'attractive' female face possesses features such as a shorter, narrower, lower jaw, fuller lips and larger eyes than an average face. ================================================================= Part 6 3D shapes This task tested your ability to mentally rotate 3D shapes. Your score: 9 out of 12 Average score for men: 8.2 out of 12 Average score for women: 7.1 out of 12 If you scored 0 - 6: Do you find yourself having to physically rotate a map to point in the direction in which you're travelling? This might explain why you scored in the lower range in the 3D shapes test. Twice as many women as men score in this category. Previous studies suggest that those with a female-type brain or with an arts background fall into this range. If you scored 7 - 9: In past studies, 50 per cent of the people who scored in this range were women and 50 per cent were men. If you scored 10 - 12: Are you an engineer or do you have a science background? People with these skills tend to score in this range. Past studies have concluded that people in this range have a more male brain. Nearly a third of men who took this test got full marks, whereas less than 10 per cent of women managed the same. Words This task looked at your verbal fluency. Your score: you associated 15 word(s) with grey and you named 10 word(s) that mean happy. We are assuming that all the words you entered are correct. Average score for men: 11.4 words total Average score for women: 12.4 words total If you produced 1 - 5 words: You are more of the strong, silent type with a male brain. You probably find it easier to express yourself in non-verbal ways, preferring action rather than words. If you produced 6 - 10 words: Most people in this range have a female-type brain. Women are said to use both sides of the brain when doing verbal tasks while men mainly use their left side. Studies have shown that girls develop vocabulary faster than boys. This difference in brain power is caused by levels of pre-natal testosterone. Ultimatum This task asked you how you would divide money. If you had to split £50 with someone, you said you would demand £25 So far on the Sex ID test, men have demanded 51.6% (£25.80) of the pot and women have demanded 51.0% (£25.50), on average. Sex differences are small in this task. Demanding less than 60% of the pot (ie £30) is more typically female. Demanding more than 65% of the pot (ie £32.50) is more typically male. Scientists believe that people with lower testosterone levels tend to take fewer risks so they are probably more willing to keep less for themselves. Those with higher testosterone levels tend to drive a harder bargain and are less compromising. Men's testosterone levels fluctuate over the seasons and are at their lowest levels during the springtime. This is said to influence their bargaining power.